JUDGE RULES McPHEE
HAS NO AUTHORITY AT
COUNCIL MEETING
A Judge recently ruled that Carterton Mayor and local bully Gary McPhee had no authority to evict Katherine Raue from a Council meeting. for asking for the return of her electoral deposit, which the thieving bully is refusing to refund, among other things, including the long called for inquiry into the illegal takeover, mismanagement and closure of the former Carterton Community Centre by a group comprising mainly of people associated with the Carterton District Council). It is ridiculous that some academic in Auckland (or anyone else for that matter) thinks that Carterton's last local body election was democratic, or even legal.
Firstly, Gary McGoofy's idea of a democratic election involves making sure that only half the town can vote for any one candidate in the first place, by refusing to have an "at large" ward. Carterton only has an a rural ward and an urban ward, unlike most places which have an 'at large' ward enabling any person in the electorate to vote for a candidate, unlike the other two. So only the voters in the rural ward could vote for me, but there wasn’t much chance of that anyway, because McGoofy made sure they were sent the candidate information for the Central Otago elections instead.
Secondly, McPhee decided to appoint a private company from Christchurch to run the Carterton elections. This company distributed the candidate information booklets for the candidates for the Central Otago elections to the voters of Carterton,
Thirdly, the same incompetent private company who sent the voters the candidate profiles for the Central Otago electorate was then employed by McPhee and his corrupt Council to count the votes in Christchurch, a decision which prevented at least fifty per cent of the mayoral candidates having a scrutineer present.
Thirdly, the same incompetent private company who sent the voters the candidate profiles for the Central Otago electorate was then employed by McPhee and his corrupt Council to count the votes in Christchurch, a decision which prevented at least fifty per cent of the mayoral candidates having a scrutineer present.
Fourthly, it is an insult to democracy and a travesty of justice that McPhee was able to stand in the first place. His much publicised boast on the front page of the local paper about the drunken home invasion and assault on the innocent occupants of a local flat amounted to a confession of a serious crime, and established a clear prima facie case.
It is completely unacceptable that the police continue to refuse to charge McPhee and his accomplice with the violent attack. This was a vicious violent, unprovoked attack on harmless people who were minding their own business, cooking their dinner, and not bothering anybody, when McPhee and fellow Council officer Chris Keegan smashed their way into their home and assaulted them with a weapon.
One of the occupants had only got out of hospital the day before after suffering a stroke, and either one of the drunken bullies would have weighed more than all of the occupants put together.
No comments:
Post a Comment